The nature of the PSED duty to have regard is informed by the particular function being exercised. See ZK v Redbridge LBC (2020);EWCA Civ 1597 at paras 82-84. In any case where a public authority’s functions under legislation are expressly directed at the needs of a protected group it may be/unnecessary to refer to the PSED, or to infer from an omission to do so a failure to have regard to that duty.
Subscribe
Get an email when we publish a new post on this blog. We’ll never share your email and you can unsubscribe any time. Our use of your details is explained in our privacy policy.
"*" indicates required fields
Headings
- Best Value (13)
- Capital Finance and Companies (57)
- Council Tax and Rates (82)
- Decision making and Contracts (285)
- Elections and Bylaws (34)
- Environment, Highways and Leisure (127)
- General (17)
- Housing (160)
- Human Rights and Public Sector Equality Duty (116)
- Judicial Control, Liability and Litigation (238)
- Land, Goods and Services (81)
- Local Authority Powers (75)
- Non Judicial Control (21)
- Planning and Environmental (181)
- Social Care (83)
- Standards (24)
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500 | © 11KBW 2025